crap tort and good tort

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
dots
BADmin (he/him)
Posts: 1022307
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
Contact:

crap tort and good tort

Post by dots »

i'd mentioned this in a thread a month or so back, so i'm finally getting around to posting the examples:

don't know why there has to be such a disparity between good and bad tortoise shell guards FROM THE SAME GOD DAMNED GUITAR MANUFACTURER, but there definitley is.

here is what i would call crap. it's a squier jagmaster, and this looks like three-day-old, moldy diarrhea. you get thiese for a street price of $280 right now. wow.
► Show Spoiler

this is better. it's a mexican jazzmaster. it doesn't look quite as sweet as a the real deal, but it at least looks like they did more than use contact sheets to make it. you gotta spend $900 to get this quality, though.
► Show Spoiler

my avri jag. notice how it actually looks like bits a material mixed together like symphony. $1900? wtf?
► Show Spoiler

and this is actually where shit gets real: '62 jag. shut your face. $3000 - 5000 and more.
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
Mages
súper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Post by Mages »

they had a big thread about this on OSG where they ordered samples from all the pickguard makers. I think in the end nothing compared to the vintage stuff but the consensus was that WD Music has the best tort. even better than Fender CS. but whatever the method was they used to make the stuff back in the day, it's long gone now.
User avatar
Justin J
.
.
Posts: 2224
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:42 pm
Location: usa

Post by Justin J »

i ordered three different samples of tort from terrapin pickguards and their very expensive "celluloid" tort is the only one that looked decent. i went to guitar center and compared it to fender avri tort and it is identical. the other stuff they sell looks screen-printed.
but nothing compares to the vintage fender stuff.
JamesSmann
.
.
Posts: 11873
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by JamesSmann »

the guard being black and not SHIT-TORT is a big reason i bought sparky's jagmaster from him...for realz. that jagmaster tort looks ASS.
User avatar
Dice
.
.
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 5:36 am
Location: Montana

Post by Dice »

'65 Jag - $1500 (last year). Guitar Fetish guard on the Strat - $11.

Image
User avatar
Bacchus
Whatever's handiest
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:10 am
Location: wandering

Post by Bacchus »

mage wrote:whatever the method was they used to make the stuff back in the day, it's long gone now.
Killing tortoises and using their shells, presumably?
Image
User avatar
Mages
súper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Post by Mages »

BacchusPaul wrote:
mage wrote:whatever the method was they used to make the stuff back in the day, it's long gone now.
Killing tortoises and using their shells, presumably?
haha, well, no. :) I meant like the 50s/60s faux tortoiseshell.
User avatar
Haze
.
.
Posts: 4924
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:27 am
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Post by Haze »

FACT: the best tort is vintage tort
EXAMPLE A:
Image
User avatar
astro
.
.
Posts: 1765
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:04 pm
Location: Montreal

Post by astro »

mage wrote:they had a big thread about this on OSG where they ordered samples from all the pickguard makers. I think in the end nothing compared to the vintage stuff but the consensus was that WD Music has the best tort. even better than Fender CS. but whatever the method was they used to make the stuff back in the day, it's long gone now.
I have a lovely red tort guard from WD on my P-Bass... it looks good enough to eat! There's a sticker on the back reminding you not to stick the pickguard on a flame because it could explode or something like that, because it's made of cellulose.

Why exactly does the vintage stuff look so damn good? Is the modern nitrate cellulose somehow different from back in the day? Were there chemicals used then that are no longer permissible?
User avatar
jamc_89
.
.
Posts: 329
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:54 am
Location: raleigh, nc

Post by jamc_89 »

the good tort is nice and... chunky. less swirled/thin/soupy (good adjectives are escaping me right now) the cheap tort on the vista jag and hotrod's strat look similar and equally poor quality. but the 62 jag and the 65 haze sleeps with have an almost pearloid-size texture, though more blended.

also, good thread!
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39159
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Personally I actually prefer the MIM Tort on the CP Jags and Jazzys to the AVRI stuff which looks a little too speckly for me and more of a dark red shade than brown, but that's just me.

I think we can all agree that the CIC Squier Jagmaster and CV Jazz bass Tort is an abomination and the rest looks pretty good.
To be honest some of the super faded cellulose vintage tort puts me off as well.
User avatar
endsjustifymeans
Grown Up Punk
Posts: 19442
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:02 pm
Location: Ball So Hard University

Post by endsjustifymeans »

astro wrote:
mage wrote:they had a big thread about this on OSG where they ordered samples from all the pickguard makers. I think in the end nothing compared to the vintage stuff but the consensus was that WD Music has the best tort. even better than Fender CS. but whatever the method was they used to make the stuff back in the day, it's long gone now.
I have a lovely red tort guard from WD on my P-Bass... it looks good enough to eat! There's a sticker on the back reminding you not to stick the pickguard on a flame because it could explode or something like that, because it's made of cellulose.

Why exactly does the vintage stuff look so damn good? Is the modern nitrate cellulose somehow different from back in the day? Were there chemicals used then that are no longer permissible?
WD's red tort is awesome. The frankensonic used to have it until it got green perloided, and it received many compliment while it had it.
dots wrote:society is crumbling because of asshoels like ends
brainfur wrote:I'm having difficulty reconciling my desire to smash the state & kill all white people with my desire for a new telecaster
User avatar
BobArsecake
a mannequin made by madmen
Posts: 10957
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:40 am
Location: Leeds (LeedsLeeds)

Post by BobArsecake »

How did they flatten the tortoise shells?
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

big shoes.
User avatar
BobArsecake
a mannequin made by madmen
Posts: 10957
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:40 am
Location: Leeds (LeedsLeeds)

Post by BobArsecake »

I think that's why archtops were invented...to fit the shell around.
User avatar
dots
BADmin (he/him)
Posts: 1022307
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
Contact:

Post by dots »

Mike wrote:Personally I actually prefer the MIM Tort on the CP Jags and Jazzys to the AVRI stuff which looks a little too speckly for me and more of a dark red shade than brown, but that's just me.

I think we can all agree that the CIC Squier Jagmaster and CV Jazz bass Tort is an abomination and the rest looks pretty good.
To be honest some of the super faded cellulose vintage tort puts me off as well.
to each his own, and it's good that you're in love with your guitar. what floors me is how much money one has to spend to go from what we all agree is an abomination to the good stuff you've got on your guitar. i mean, $600 more for a better pickguard and electronics? i actually thought the neck on the jagmaster was decent, every bit as playable as the CP jazzies and jags.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39159
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

It's upsetting because it didn't used to be this way (the Vista squiers have nice tort), it's a fairly recent regression.
User avatar
Narco Martenot
.
.
Posts: 361
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by Narco Martenot »

It seems as if somewhere along the way, the meaning of tortoiseshell within the guitar world changed to describe anything containing a swirl. Most of the stuff I have seen used on guitars after the 70s looks pathetic when compared to the real deal. The stuff used on 60s Fender guitars generally looks nice.

This is what genuine tortoiseshell (which comes from a hawksbill turtle) looks like:

Image

Image

Image

Image


The only thing that seems to come close these days is Tor-tis by Greven. It's somewhat expensive, but it's far superior to anything else out there.
User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

I can't remember the name of the guy who did this for me but my custom guard was made from celluloid with the the bottom ply made of regular plastic to stop shrinkage and warpage. It's supposed to be the 'real deal' (in vintage terms) and have a 3D quality but it looks kind of reguar to me. But hey, it only cost an extra tenner from the regular stuff.

Image

I'll add a close up if anyone's interested, it does have a certain 3D quality. It's definitely not a print job like my original CIJ - that was terrible.
User avatar
dots
BADmin (he/him)
Posts: 1022307
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
Contact:

Post by dots »

absolutely, 100% agreed w/ narco. his examples of tort are what i think of when somebody describes it, and it more closely resembles the old fender and the avri materials. you're right; the whole idea of swirling has become WAY overstated.