Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:58 pm
nup, it went for 1300, not so much for maverick, but still to much for me this timeNickS wrote:Wow. I suppose it'll go for over $1500?
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:47 pm
I'd still be sweating to send any money if that was me. risking 1400... sheesh
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:55 pm
Closer to $1400 on a zero feedback seller... hmmm.downer wrote:nup, it went for 1300, not so much for maverick, but still to much for me this timeNickS wrote:Wow. I suppose it'll go for over $1500?
OT, re ebay scamming:
did you see http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... 0205210628 ? from a disenchanted ebay seller.
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:56 pm
AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHAT THE HELL MAN! that is unbelievably awesome haha.NickS wrote:Closer to $1400 on a zero feedback seller... hmmm.downer wrote:nup, it went for 1300, not so much for maverick, but still to much for me this timeNickS wrote:Wow. I suppose it'll go for over $1500?
OT, re ebay scamming:
did you see http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... 0205210628 ? from a disenchanted ebay seller.
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:04 am
I dont trust 0 feedback sellers.
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:39 am
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:41 am
I don't trust YOU.nsv wrote:I dont trust 0 feedback sellers.
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:41 am
That is so subtle and so beautiful. I see he did in fact stop at the magic number.Reece wrote:
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:43 am
He was at 50, looks like an admin with a good sense of humour deleted a post of his.avj wrote:That is so subtle and so beautiful. I see he did in fact stop at the magic number.Reece wrote:
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:47 pm
why did you dig up a thread that's over a year old?!? I started reading this without paying attention to the date, and was like WTF?!?!? JUSTIN'S BACK AGAIN?!?!?
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:49 pm
yar, he's been banned.
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:38 pm
oh FFS.