vintage distortion+

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9482
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

Doog wrote:Lacking a tone control = worthless to me.
it's not lacking any meat
User avatar
mewithoutus
.
.
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:46 am
Contact:

Post by mewithoutus »

yeah dude, it has meat. meatmeatmeatmeatmeatmeatmeat
rich people say fuck yeah hey hey
heavium wrote:grow a bat army in my room and train them to attack when someone comes in
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9482
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

That's what real women need.
User avatar
mewithoutus
.
.
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:46 am
Contact:

Post by mewithoutus »

haha apparently.

i might be kicking the distortion + off the board in favor of a phaser...
rich people say fuck yeah hey hey
heavium wrote:grow a bat army in my room and train them to attack when someone comes in
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9482
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »



Phasers are pretty damn useless and usually suck alot of your tone away.
User avatar
Lanark
.
.
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Minneapolis
Contact:

Post by Lanark »

Nick wrote:

Phasers are pretty damn useless and usually suck alot of your tone away.
Phaser is like anything else. It's an effect and it can be abused. Smaller doses in just the right spots and it's really effective. On all the time and it gets old pretty fast.

My stage amp ('73 SG Systems by Gibson/Norlin) came with a Maestro Phase Shift built right in it. (the kind with the three colored speed rocker switches) so tone suck is less of an issue. It's part of the design. I only use it for one solo and these days, I think one bridge and an alternative for another five second bit if I don't bring the Flanger.

Maestro's 70's Phaser (same case as the fuzz I posted before) is a monster of an effect. Super wide warm sweep and those big wheels you can adjust with your feet. Absolute genius design.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23059
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Nick wrote:
Doog wrote:Lacking a tone control = worthless to me.
it's not lacking any meat
Maybe, but it'd still bug me. I had a Hendrix Fuzz given to me years back and though it sounded good, it was so much more toppy than the clean signal. No good if you wanted to switch between them. The tone control just seems like such a big omission to me.
sunshiner wrote: You don't understand my kindness, drown in shit
User avatar
mewithoutus
.
.
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:46 am
Contact:

Post by mewithoutus »

yeah i felt it weird that it didnt have a tone control, but it actually sounds really good on the clean channel of the deluxe. wahoo.
rich people say fuck yeah hey hey
heavium wrote:grow a bat army in my room and train them to attack when someone comes in